BBC NewsBorrowing was £17.4bn last month, the second highest October figure since monthly records began in 1993.
Finito World
When President Donald Trump welcomed Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to the White House in October 2025, it was touted as a meeting that would “take the US–Australia relationship to the next level.” What got less attention in the headlines was the wide strategic sweep behind the deal signed that day: an agreement on critical minerals and rare‑earth supply chains. On a surface level it’s about mining and processing; beneath that it’s about the question that has quietly become central to Trump’s global agenda — China.
At the signing ceremony, the two nations framed the deal as a counter‑weight to Beijing’s dominance in rare earths, which power everything from electric vehicles to missiles. The agreement commits both the United States and Australia to invest billions — the White House said more than US$3 billion over six months; Canberra has referred to an US$8.5 billion “pipeline” ready to go. The framework gives special emphasis to mining, separation, processing and supply‑chain resilience.
China is central to this story. According to the US Geological Survey, China has the largest rare earths reserves in the world and dominates processing of those minerals. When Beijing imposes export controls or delays approvals, it creates ripple effects in technology, defence and industry. In announcing the deal, Trump said: “In about a year from now we’ll have so much critical mineral and rare earths that you won’t know what to do with them.” The timing is not coincidental: China had recently introduced further export restrictions on key minerals and magnets, prompting the allies to act.
But the deal is not just about minerals. It reflects a broader strategic posture from the Trump administration: projecting economic and military partnership in the Indo‑Pacific as a hedge against Chinese leverage. Alongside the minerals commitment, Trump reaffirmed support for the AUKUS nuclear‑submarine pact involving the US, UK and Australia, and promised accelerated submarine deliveries. The minerals deal thus becomes part of a wider attempt to re‑engineer the raw‑material foundations of power.
The challenge is massive. While the agreement sets ambitious targets – financing specific projects like a gallium refinery in Western Australia, and setting minimum‑price floors for critical minerals – observers warn that adjusting the global supply‑chain balance will take years. Australian and US firms will need huge capital, regulatory reform, and infrastructure to rival China’s entrenched dominance. A recent Reuters analysis described the deal as “an important first step” but not a game‑changer on its own.
From an economic lens, the deal sends clear signals to markets: the West acknowledges its vulnerability and is mobilising resources to fix it. For the mining, tech and defence sectors, this opens opportunities: rare earths miners, processors and refiners stand to gain. For manufacturers reliant on secure, non‑Chinese supply‑chains — in electronics, EVs, aerospace — this may ease long‑term risk. But for young engineers, geologists, supply‑chain specialists and entrepreneurs, it raises the bar: the urgent question is not if new mines and refiners will be built, but when, where, and how fast.
Politically, Trump’s move has a dual function. First, it projects strength ahead of his much‑anticipated meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping. The minerals deal boosts his negotiating posture: he carries not just diplomatic leverage, but a tangible pipeline of alternatives to China. Second, it suits a domestic narrative of “America first” — reclaiming industrial and resource sovereignty from reliance on “foe” economies. Yet this posture also carries risk: if delivery slips or costs balloon, the promise of cheaper, secure minerals will be tested.
In sum, the rare‑earth deal with Australia is more than a mining pact. It reveals how Trump is preparing for the biggest question of all: how can the West reduce dependence on China for the raw materials that underpin the future of technology and security? Execution matters. The ambition is clear; the timeline, costs and geopolitics are tricky. But the message is unmistakable: the mineral foundations of the 21st‑century economy are now front‑and‑centre in the great‑power competition.
